Microsurgical Reconstruction

Sternal Reconstruction & Stabilization

Salvage of the sternum and mediastinum after deep sternal wound infection, dehiscence, and mediastinitis following cardiac surgery — a life-threatening complication that demands immediate, expert reconstructive management.

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) — also called post-sternotomy mediastinitis — is one of the most feared complications of cardiac surgery. It occurs in approximately 1–3% of patients after open heart surgery and carries a reported mortality rate of 10–47% without aggressive treatment.1,2 Flap-based reconstruction, combined with sternal stabilization and antibiotic therapy, is the cornerstone of modern management and has dramatically improved survival compared to earlier approaches.

Understanding the Problem: Sternal Wounds After Cardiac Surgery

The sternum is divided down the midline (median sternotomy) to access the heart during most cardiac operations — including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve replacement, aortic surgery, and heart transplantation. At the end of the operation, the sternum is wired closed and the overlying tissue is sutured shut. In most patients, this heals uneventfully. But in a significant minority, wound complications develop:

  • Superficial wound dehiscence: Separation of the skin and subcutaneous layers without involvement of the sternum itself; typically managed with local wound care or secondary closure
  • Sternal dehiscence: Separation of the sternal wires, allowing the two halves of the sternum to move independently; this causes pain, instability, and clicking with breathing — and creates the conditions for deep infection
  • Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) / Mediastinitis: Infection extending into the mediastinum (the space behind the sternum containing the heart and great vessels). This is the most dangerous form — DSWI is associated with high mortality and requires urgent surgical debridement and flap reconstruction1,2

Who Is at Risk?

Certain patient factors significantly increase the risk of DSWI after cardiac surgery:3

  • Diabetes mellitus — particularly poorly controlled diabetes or insulin dependence
  • Obesity
  • Use of both internal mammary arteries (bilateral IMA harvest) for coronary bypass, which devascularizes the sternum
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Reoperation or prolonged bypass time
  • Immunosuppression (transplant patients, corticosteroid use)
  • Renal failure
  • Smoking

VAC Therapy: Bridging to Reconstruction

In the initial management of DSWI, the wound is opened, debrided of infected and necrotic tissue, and all non-viable material — including infected sternal bone — is removed. Negative-pressure wound therapy (VAC/NPWT) is then applied to the mediastinal cavity. VAC therapy reduces bacterial load, promotes granulation tissue, and manages the high volume of wound exudate while the patient is optimized for definitive reconstruction.4 Preoperative VAC use before pectoralis flap reconstruction has been associated with reduced flap complications in some series. VAC is a bridge — not a definitive treatment — in DSWI; patients should proceed to flap closure as soon as they are medically stable.

Flap Reconstruction: The Mainstay of Treatment

Vascularized flap reconstruction is the definitive treatment for DSWI. Flaps bring in a new blood supply to a devitalized field, fill the dead space of the mediastinal cavity, and provide durable soft tissue coverage over the reconstructed sternum.1,2

Pectoralis Major Advancement Flaps

The pectoralis major muscle is the workhorse flap for sternal wound reconstruction, used in the vast majority of cases. The muscle can be used in two configurations:

  • Advancement (turnover) flap: The pectoralis is detached from the humerus and advanced medially to fill the sternal wound. The dominant blood supply — the thoracoacromial artery — remains intact, ensuring reliable perfusion
  • Turnover flap: The muscle is detached from its lateral insertion and "turned over" into the mediastinum like the page of a book, based on the perforating branches of the internal mammary artery (when available)

Bilateral pectoralis major flaps are used when the sternal defect is wide or when unilateral coverage is insufficient. Multiple studies confirm that pectoralis major flaps achieve reliable wound closure with low rates of flap failure.5,6 A cadaveric study confirmed the anatomical reliability of this approach for providing full sternal coverage.3

Rectus Abdominis Flap

The vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flap is the preferred alternative when both pectoralis muscles are not available — as occurs when both internal mammary arteries were harvested for bypass grafting (eliminating the perforating branches that would supply a turnover pectoralis flap) or when the pectoralis muscles are atrophic, damaged, or previously used. Based on the superior epigastric artery, the VRAM flap provides reliable muscle bulk for filling the inferior mediastinum and lower sternal wound. It is particularly valuable for DSWI extending into the sub-xiphoid region.7

Omental Flap

The omentum — the intra-abdominal fatty apron — has exceptional antibacterial and angiogenic properties. It can be brought into the chest through a laparotomy incision to fill the mediastinal dead space, particularly in cases with deep infection extending behind the heart or when pectoralis coverage alone is insufficient. Omental flaps are often combined with pectoralis flaps in the most severe DSWI cases with infection extending into the deep mediastinum.2,8 A systematic review and meta-analysis by Cancelli et al. demonstrated that pectoralis major and omental flaps provide comparable mortality benefits when used appropriately, with the omental flap favored for deeper infections.1

Hardware Management: Remove or Retain?

A key decision in DSWI management is what to do with the sternal wires and any other hardware (pacemaker leads, surgical clips). In most cases, infected wires must be removed as part of debridement — leaving infected hardware in place perpetuates the infection and prevents healing. However, sternal stability must then be addressed:

  • Re-wiring: In cases with minimal contamination and viable sternal bone, the sternum can be re-approximated with new wires or plates after debridement
  • Sternal plating (rigid fixation): Titanium sternal plating systems can provide superior stability compared to wires alone, particularly in patients with sternal necrosis or poor bone quality. Rigid fixation prevents paradoxical sternal motion, improves respiratory mechanics, and may reduce postoperative pain. Some evidence suggests plating reduces hospital stay and mechanical ventilation duration
  • No sternal re-approximation: When sternal bone is extensively infected or necrotic and must be widely excised (sternectomy), no re-approximation is possible. Flap bulk fills the resultant cavity and provides stability

Collaboration with Cardiac Surgery

DSWI management is a collaborative undertaking between plastic surgery and cardiac surgery. Dr. Lakhiani works directly with cardiac surgeons to plan the timing of debridement, hardware decisions, and flap reconstruction — often performing the reconstructive portion of the procedure at the same sitting as the cardiac surgery debridement. Infectious disease consultation is essential to guide antibiotic selection, duration, and suppressive therapy in complex cases.

Outcomes & Mortality Data

DSWI outcomes have improved dramatically with the adoption of flap-based reconstruction, but this remains a high-stakes complication.

  • Historical mortality from DSWI treated with open packing or wound care alone exceeded 40–50%; modern flap reconstruction has reduced this to 10–15% in most series1,2
  • Mortality is not limited to the acute hospitalization — a long-term study by Hernandez and Lehr (2021) demonstrated excess mortality persisting for years after DSWI, emphasizing the systemic impact of this complication9
  • Pectoralis major and omental flaps achieve comparable in-hospital mortality; flap choice should be guided by anatomy and extent of infection rather than arbitrary preference1
  • Preoperative VAC therapy may reduce flap complications when used as a bridge to formal reconstruction4
  • Patients who survive DSWI face prolonged hospitalization (often 3–6 weeks), extended IV antibiotics, and rehabilitation — full recovery takes months
  • Pectoralis flap reconstruction achieves durable wound closure in 85–95% of cases; revision procedures are sometimes necessary for partial breakdown or persistent sinus tracts5,6

When First-Line Reconstruction Is Insufficient

In a minority of patients, primary flap reconstruction does not achieve complete wound healing. Salvage options include:

  • Combination flap reconstruction: Adding an omental flap to bilateral pectoralis coverage for deep infections that track behind the heart or great vessels8
  • Free flap reconstruction: When all regional options have been used or damaged, free tissue transfer — typically a latissimus dorsi or anterolateral thigh free flap — can provide new coverage to a failed sternal wound
  • Revision debridement and repeat VAC: For cases with persistent or recurrent infection, re-debridement followed by VAC preparation before secondary flap closure
  • Long-term suppressive antibiotics: In patients who are not candidates for further surgery, chronic oral antibiotic suppression may be the only option to prevent sepsis from residual hardware infection

References

  1. Cancelli G, Alzghari T, Dimagli A, et al. Mortality after sternal reconstruction with pectoralis major flap vs omental flap for postsurgical mediastinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg. 2022;37(12):4483-4492. doi:10.1111/jocs.17189. PubMed
  2. Hever P, Singh P, Eiben I, Eiben P, Nikkhah D. The management of deep sternal wound infection: Literature review and reconstructive algorithm. JPRAS Open. 2021;29:62-77. doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2021.02.007. PubMed
  3. O'Keeffe N, Concannon E, Stanley A, et al. Cadaveric evaluation of sternal reconstruction using the pectoralis muscle flap. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(7-8):E316-E321. doi:10.1111/ans.15268. PubMed
  4. Barbera F, Lorenzetti F, Marsili R, et al. The Impact of Preoperative Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy on Pectoralis Major Muscle Flap Reconstruction for Deep Sternal Wound Infections. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(1):28-32. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001799. PubMed
  5. Zahiri HR, Lumpkins K, Kelishadi S, et al. Pectoralis major turnover versus advancement technique for sternal wound reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(1):66-70. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182367dc5. PubMed
  6. Myllykangas HM, Halonen J, Husso A, Berg LT. Decreasing complications of pectoralis major muscle flap reconstruction with two modalities of negative pressure wound therapy. Scand J Surg. 2022;111(1):37-45. doi:10.1177/14574969211043330. PubMed
  7. Jacobs B, Ghersi MM. Intercostal artery-based rectus abdominis transposition flap for sternal wound reconstruction: fifteen-year experience and literature review. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(4):390-395. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e318070c6fb. PubMed
  8. Kuonqui K, Janhofer DE, Takayama H, Ascherman JA. A Review of 559 Sternal Wound Reconstructions at a Single Institution: Indications and Outcomes for Combining an Omental Flap With Bilateral Pectoralis Major Flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;90(2):143-149. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003478. PubMed
  9. Hernandez R, Lehr EJ. Mortality following deep sternal wound infection — not just a short-term complication? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60(3):537-539. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezab156. PubMed

Schedule a Consultation

If you or a family member has developed a sternal wound complication after cardiac surgery, early consultation is critical. Dr. Lakhiani works urgently with cardiac surgery teams to provide timely, expert reconstruction.

Request Appointment
Back to All Specialties